(ITA - 2016 - 1 FASE)Brazils business Belindia Why

(ITA - 2016 - 1ª FASE)

Brazil’s business Belindia – Why the country produces fewer world-class companies than it should

BRAZILIANS make up almost  of the planet’s population and produce about  of its output. Yet of the firms in Fortune magazine’s 2014 “Global 500” ranking of the biggest companies by revenue only seven, or  were from Brazil, down from eight in 2013. And on Forbes’s list of the  most highly valued firms worldwide just 25, or  were Brazilian. The country’s biggest corporate “star”, Petrobras, is mired in scandals, its debt downgraded to junk status. ¹In 1974 Edmar Bacha, an economist, described its economy as “Belindia”, a Belgium-sized island of prosperity in a sea of India-like poverty. Since then Brazil has done far better than India in alleviating poverty, but in business terms it still has a Belindia problem: a handful of world-class enterprises in a sea of poorly run ones.

²Brazilian businesses face a litany of obstacles: bureaucracy, complex tax rules, shoddy infrastructure and a shortage of skilled workers – to say nothing of a stagnant economy. But a big reason for Brazilian firms’ underperformance is less well rehearsed: poor management. Since 2004 John van Reenen of the London School of Economics and his colleagues have surveyed  midsized firms in 34 countries, grading them on a five-point scale based on how well they monitor their operations, set targets and reward performance. Brazilian firms’ average score, at  is similar to that of China’s and a bit above that of India’s. But Brazil ranks below Chile (2.8) and Mexico (2.9); America leads the pack with 3.3. ³The best Brazilian firms score as well as the best American ones, but its long tail of badly run ones is fatter.

Part of the explanation is that medium and large firms tend to be better-organised than small ones, and not only because well-run ones are likelier to grow. ⁴Brazil offers incentives aplenty to stay bitty, such as preferential tax treatment for firms with a turnover of no more than  reais  As they expand, many firms split rather than face increased scrutiny from the taxman. According to the World Bank, a midsized Brazilian firm spends  hours filing taxes each year. In Mexico, it is  hours.

⁵Ownership patterns play a part too. ⁶Many Brazilian concerns are controlled by an individual shareholder, or one or two families. ⁷Two-thirds of those with sales of more than $1 billion a year are family-owned, notes Heinz-Peter Elstrodt of McKinsey, a consulting firm. That is less than in Mexico  or South Korea  but more than in America or Europe. Mr Van Reenen’s research shows that where family owners plump for outside chief executives, their firms do no worse than similarly sized ones with more diverse shareholders. But all too often they pick kin over professional managers – and performance suffers. ⁸This is particularly true in “low-trust” societies like Brazil, where bosses hire relatives instead of better-qualified strangers to avoid being robbed or sued for falling foul of overly worker-friendly labour laws.

⁹Decades of economic turmoil – ¹⁰which ended when hyperinflation was vanquished in 1994 – meant that companies were managed from crisis to crisis. ¹¹This forced Brazilian firms to be nimble. But it also encouraged short-termism, which management consultants and academics finger as Brazilian managers’ number-one sin. Faced with a record drought in 2014, ¹²and a subsequent spike in energy prices in a hydropower-dependent country, Usiminas, a steelmaker, stopped smelting and started selling power it had bought on cheap long-term contracts. Energy sales made up most of its operating profits that year. ¹³Such short-term stunts are hardly the path to long-term greatness.

Worse, crisis management all too often consists of going cap in hand to the government. ¹⁴Brazilian bosses continue to waste hours in meetings with politicians that could be better spent improving their businesses. ¹⁵In January 2014, as vehicle sales flagged, ¹⁶the automotive industry’s reflex reaction was to descend on the capital, Brasília, and demand an extension of its costly tax breaks. Thanks to lifelines cast by the state, feeble firms stay afloat rather than sink and make room for more agile competitors. Shielded from competition by tariffs, subsidies and local-content rules, they have little reason to innovate. A locally invented gizmo which lets cars run on both petrol and biodiesel is nifty. But, asks Marcos Lisboa of Insper, a business school, does that really justify six decades of public support for the motor industry?

The dead hand of government

Indeed, a glance at the “Belgian” end of Brazil’s corporate landscape suggests that successful firms cluster in sectors the state has not tried desperately to help, such as retail or finance. ¹⁷Bradesco, a big lender, is internationally praised as a pioneer of automated banking. Each month Arezzo creates  new models of women’s shoes, and picks 170-odd to sell in its shops.

Brazil’s other world-beaters are in industries like agriculture and aerospace, which are free to compete at home and abroad, and in which the government sticks to its proper role. In 1990 farms were allowed to consolidate and to buy foreign machines, pesticides and fertiliser. Efforts by Brazil’s trade negotiators opened up export markets. JBS, a meat giant, can slaughter  head of cattle a day, selling more beef than any rival worldwide. Thanks in part to Embrapa, the national agriculture-research agency, Brazilian farms have been raising productivity by about  a year for two decades. Similarly, a supply of skilled engineers and know-how from the government’s Technological Institute of Aeronautics has helped turn Embraer, privatised in 1994, into one of the world’s most successful aircraft-makers.

The success of businesses such as these offers a lesson for the state. The best way to make Brazil’s underperforming firms more competitive would be to make them compete more. ¹⁸Coddling by the state can be more a curse than a blessing. Ronald Reagan’s dictum that the nine most terrifying words in the English language are, “I’m from the government and I’m here to help,” translates well into Flemish, Hindi and Brazilian Portuguese.

By Schumpeter. In: The Economist. Feb 28th, 2015. 

 

Considere as seguintes afirmativas:

I. Em “This forced Brazilian firms to be nimble. But it also encouraged short-termism, which management consultants...” (reference 11), os pronomes sublinhados possuem o mesmo referente.

II. Em “The best Brazilian firms score as well as the best American ones...” (reference 3) e em “Brazil offers incentives aplenty to stay bitty, such as preferential tax treatment…” (reference 4) os termos sublinhados têm o mesmo sentido.

III. Em “This is particularly true in “low-trust” societies like Brazil…” (reference 8) e em “Bradesco, a big lender, is internationally praised as a pioneer…” (reference 17) os termos sublinhados têm o mesmo sentido.

IV. Em “...which ended when hyperinflation was vanquished in 1994” (reference 10) e em “…the automotive industry’s reflex reaction was to descend on the capital…” (reference 16), as formas verbais sublinhadas estão na voz passiva.

Está(ao) correta(s)