(ITA - 2004 - 1a Fase)
First, let me tell you where I’m coming from. Before I saw “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring”, I didn’t know the difference between an orc and an elf, or what Middle-earth was in the middle of. This review is coming to you from a Tolkien-freezone. I went in to Peter Jackson’s movie – the first of a trilogy – with no preconceptions. I came out, three hours later, sorry I’d have to wait a year to see what happens next in Frodo Baggins’s battle against the Dark Lord, Sauron, and thinking a trip to the bookstore to pick “The Two Towers” might be in order. (...)
This is a violent movie – too violent for little ones – and there are moments more “Matrix” than medieval. Yet it transcends cheap thrills; we root for the survival of our heroes with a depth of feeling that may come as a surprise. The movie keeps drawing you in deeper. Unlike so many overcooked action movies these days, “Fellowship” doesn’t entertain you into a stupor. It leaves you with your wits intact, hungry for more.
(fonte omitida para evitar indução na resposta)
O texto acima foi redigido originalmente como
uma sinopse do filme “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring”, dirigido por Peter Jackson.
uma crítica ao filme “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring”.
um informativo sobre o lançamento do filme “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring”, dirigido por Tolkien.
uma palestra sobre a obra literária de Tolkien e os filmes de Peter Jackson.
uma mensagem enviada por e-mail ao fã-clube de Tolkien.