(ITA - 2004 - 1a Fase)
First, let me tell you where I’m coming from. Before I saw “The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring”, I didn’t know the difference between an orc and an elf, or what Middle-earth was in the middle of. This review is coming to you from a Tolkien-freezone. I went in to Peter Jackson’s movie – the first of a trilogy – with no preconceptions. I came out, three hours later, sorry I’d have to wait a year to see what happens next in Frodo Baggins’s battle against the Dark Lord, Sauron, and thinking a trip to the bookstore to pick “The Two Towers” might be in order. (...)
This is a violent movie – too violent for little ones – and there are moments more “Matrix” than medieval. Yet it transcends cheap thrills; we root for the survival of our heroes with a depth of feeling that may come as a surprise. The movie keeps drawing you in deeper. Unlike so many overcooked action movies these days, “Fellowship” doesn’t entertain you into a stupor. It leaves you with your wits intact, hungry for more.
(fonte omitida para evitar indução na resposta)
Assinale a opção correta.
O autor do texto é leitor assíduo da obra de Tolkien.
O autor do texto tinha grandes expectativas com relação ao filme antes de assisti-lo.
O filme fez com que o autor se sentisse tentado a adquirir um livro de Tolkien.
O autor recomenda o filme para adultos e crianças.
O filme dirigido por Peter Jackson assemelha-se a Matrix.